Categorized | News

Tags : , , , , , ,

Ex Google Employees Released Cuil Search Engine - Fail

Posted on 28 July 2008

CuilTwo ex Google engineers, Tom Costello and Anna Patterson, along with a third person, Russel Power, have released a new search engine. Cuil started with 120 billion indexed pages and they stated that their new search engine has the biggest index of them all. Probably they haven’t read Google’s last post, where they say to have indexed more than 1 trillion pages, which is almost 8 times more than that.
From the tests I was able to make until it got down, it doesn’t seem very relevant and there are a lot of searches it returns no results, while other search engines do.
Cuil is a wannabe semantic search engine, understanding the meaning of words, but it’s not very good at it. Until now, I didn’t find anything I could like at it, better than Google. What I am satisfied of is the simple design.

This post was written by:

Alex Dumitru - who has written 197 posts on Sandossu / Alex Dumitru.


Contact the author

26 Comments For This Post

  1. Claudiu Design says:

    There’s plenty of search engines on the www and while google and yahoo are on I don’t see why oanyone would like to use this small search engines.

    As for design it’s prety cool actualy. With this design the top position competition is eleminated and this is a + for the engine from my point of view.

  2. Monavie says:

    I like the fresh, dark-yet-classy design of Cuil, but I don’t really like the way it searches. It reminds me of Stumbleupon, where it gives you many options but doesn’t give you the most relevant one. But they are new, and I think they are off to a good start!

  3. Auto Scratcher says:

    Simple as it may be (and I love minimizing) but does this even come close to making a dent in the world of search engines?

  4. GeorgeJipa says:

    I think that cuil will not have a good future.. because google it`s too powerful to defeat it.

  5. FireFighter Jobs says:

    Has yet to index my site after two weeks of waiting…hmm…. not sure if it will be big or not.

  6. Business Simulations says:

    I just don’t see this search engine doing anything to Google, what I do see it doing is dying out and people forgetting it. Oh well though.

  7. A dust collecting fool says:

    This SE is not ready for prime time. It’s too bad they hyped it so much for such a bas product. Maybe over time it will be a killer SE, but that isn’t likely.

  8. Internet Games says:

    They should have thought of a better name. When I first heard of cuil I pronounced it kee-ul. I guess it’s supposed to sound like “kewl”. Branding **** up in my opinion.

  9. Kristian Liebrand says:

    Two ex Google engineers, Tom Costello and Anna Patterson, along with a third person, Russel Power, have released a new search engine. Cuil started with 120 billion indexed pages and they stated that their new search engine has the biggest index of them all.

  10. Mark says:

    I think that Cuil will be forgotten very soon. They made it public very soon and they will probably never have similar media attention again as it’s no more attractive for media. Google needs some serious competitor but Cuil is not the case.

  11. GeckoGo says:

    Google’s main strength is in providing the most relevant and useful pages to the user. Cuil needs to go a step beyond Google in that regard to have a shot, and I think they’re a long way off still. I’m very used to the way Google displays searches too, so their display was odd to me too.

  12. Messy Designer says:

    I hope this turns out to be a Google competitor eventually. Google really needs it !

  13. Someone says:

    To see the retard who post such stupidity…. he has no idea about search engines, he performed some “tests” …Google has years of feedback from users in order for relevancy, Cuil is good enopugh for a new one.

  14. ?ark? says:

    As for design it’s prety cool actualy. With this design the top position competition is eleminated and this is a + for the engine from my point of view.

  15. A dust collecting fool says:

    After today Google will have added to their companies growth. They just keep getting bigger.

  16. Drug Rehab Austin says:

    Definitely a fail.. I’ve heard so many bad reports. So far — I’m not impressed, but maybe they’ll improve with time.

  17. Bernhard says:

    Nearly each week look in I here and read with large interest the interesting and always well written contributions. Today I would like to leave gladly to a greeting from Thuringia in Germany!

  18. web tasar?m? says:

    cuil is good but not better than google now, hakia is also alternative for google

  19. Kit Kat says:

    There is more then enough space in the cyberspace to accomodate one more search engine. I think instead of thinking big, they should go niche first.

  20. DNfer says:

    just had a look at the search engine, first time I heard about it. interface is great. specially the use of ajax

  21. XL Roger Hamilton says:

    This is an informative post. Thanks.

  22. Almir Bojkovic says:

    Great post very detailed and never even heard of this search engine i checked it out but is no where near being the next big thing or overtaking google

    http://www.spreadingyourcashflow.com

  23. Rachel Suites says:

    I have never heard of this to be honest, think I’ll just stick with Google!

  24. Duracell akkus says:

    Today’s three search engines are very popular one of them most popular is google after that yahoo and lastly MSN. Other search engines hardly known by the users. I think I am not sure it will rise or not. can be in future it get rise….

  25. Fancy Dress says:

    Hmmm, I think that Cuil will be forgotten very soon. They made it public very soon and they will probably never have similar media attention again as it’s no more attractive for media. Google needs some serious competitor but Cuil is not the case.

  26. Johnny Moon says:

    I think instead of thinking big, they should go niche first.There is more then enough space in the cyberspace to accomodate one more search engine,Cuil is not the case.

Leave a Reply